Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Abstract

Tannin, anthocyanins and their reaction products play a major role in the quality of red wines. They contribute to their sensory characteristics, particularly colour and astringency. Grape tannins and anthocyanins are extracted during red wine fermentation. However, their concentration and composition change over time, due to their strong chemical reactivity1. It is also well known that yeasts influence the wine phenolic content, either through the release of metabolites involved in the formation of derived pigments1, or through polyphenol adsorption2,3. Up to now, this adsorption has mainly been attributed to cell walls, though it has been supposed that small tannin dimers and trimers could enter the periplasmic space through the wall pores and interact with the plasma membrane4. Interactions between polyphenols and inactivated yeast cells or cell walls obtained from an enological commercial strain were studied first by means of adsorption isotherms in a model wine-like solution5. The framework of this study was the aging of red wines. Polyphenols were skin and seed tannins, and a pool of polyphenols purified from a red wine (Merlot). Results evidenced a high capacity of whole cells to irreversibly adsorb grape and wine tannins whereas only weak interactions were observed for cell walls. This point was quite unexpected considering literature and raised the question of the part played by cell walls in the yeast ability to fix wine polyphenols. In the present work, polyphenol location after their interactions with inactivated yeast cells or cell walls was studied by means of transmission electron microscopy, light epifluorescence and confocal microscopy. Microscopy observations evidenced that if tannins interact with cell walls, and especially cell wall mannoproteins, they mostly diffuse freely through the cell wall and plasma membrane of dead cells to interact with their cytoplasmic components. This raised the question of yeast interactions with polyphenols in the case of living cells. The study was thus extended and interactions studied during fermentation, at different stages. The impact of polyphenols on fermentation kinetic and yeast growth rate were determined. In our experimental conditions, the exponential phase of the fermentation and the yeast growth rate were affected by polyphenols. Confocal microscopy observations allowed evidencing the diffusion of polyphenols in living cells. These results demonstrate that interactions between yeast cells and polyphenols are not limited to cell walls. They also involve cytoplasmic components and may influence yeast metabolism.

Litterature cited: 1.Fulcrand et al. (2006), Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 57(3), 289. 2.Morata et al. (2003), J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 4084 3.Mazauric et al. (2006). J. Agric. Food Chem.,54, 3876 4.Marquez et al. (2009), J. Agric. Food Chem., 57, 8026 5.Mekoue et al. (2015), J. Agric. Food Chem, 63, 660. 6.Mekoue et al. (2015), J. Agric. Food Chem, 63, 7539

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Julie Mekoue Nguela*, Aude Vernhet, Jean-Marc Brillouet, Nathalie Sieczkowski

*INRA/SUPAGRO

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Effect of supplementation with inactive yeast during alcoholic fermentation in base wine for sparkling

INTRODUCTION: Foam stability of sparkling wines is significantly favored by the presence of surface active agents such as proteins and polysaccharides [1]. For that reason, the renowned sparkling wines are aged after the second fermentation in contact with the lees for several months (even years). Thereby wines are enriched in these macromolecules due to yeast autolysis. Since this practice is slow and costly, winemakers are seeking for alternative procedures to increase their concentration in base wines. In that sense, the supplementation with inactive yeast during alcoholic fermentation has been proposed [2]. The aim of this study was to determine whether this new strategy is really useful for enriching base wines in macromolecules and for improving foam properties of the base wines.

Use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant in juices and wines

Chitosan is a polysaccharide produced from the deacetylation of chitin extracted from crustaceous and fungi. In winemaking chitosan is mainly used in the clarification of grape juice and wine, stabilization of white wines, removal of metals and to prevent wine spoilage by undesired microorganisms. The addition of chitosan to model wine systems was able to retard browning, reduce levels of metallic ions (Fe and Cu) and to protect varietal thiols due to its antiradical activity1. The present experiment was planned in order to evaluate the use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant at three different stages of Sauvignon blanc fermentation and winemaking. Sauvignon blanc juices from three different locations were obtained at a commercial winery in Marlborough, New Zealand. One lots of grapes was collected from a receival bin and pressed into juice with a water-bag press, and a further juice sample was collected from a commercial pressing operation. Chitosan (1 g/L, low molecular weight, 75 – 85% deacetylated) was added to the juice after pressing, after cold settling, after fermentation, or at all these stages. Controls without any chitosan additions were also prepared.

Quantification of the production of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 during wine oxidation

Chemical studies aiming at assessing how a wine reacts towards oxidation usually focus on the characterization of wine constituents, such as polyphenols, or oxidation products. As an alternative, the key oxidation intermediate hydrogen peroxide H2O2 has never been quantified, although it plays a pivotal role in wine oxidation. H2O2 is obtained from molecular oxygen as the result of a first cascade of oxidation reactions involving metal ions and polyphenols. The produced H2O2 then reacts in a second cascade of oxidation to produce reactive hydroxyl radicals that can attack almost any chemical substrate in wine.

Capture depletion of grapevine DNA: an approach to advance the study of microbial community in wine

The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has helped understand microbial genetics in oenology. Current studies mainly focus on barcoded amplicon NGS but not shotgun sequencing, which is useful for functional analyses. Since the high percentage of grapevine DNA conceals the microbial DNA in must, the majority of sequencing data is wasted in bioinformatic analyses. Here we present capture depletion of grapevine whole genome DNA.