terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Smoke exposure effects on red wines: how much is too much?

Smoke exposure effects on red wines: how much is too much?

Abstract

Increasing wildfire frequency in the United States has led to the indirect impact of smoke in vineyards, affecting grape quality and wine sensory attributes, commonly called “smoke taint”.1 During a smoke event, grapes absorb volatile phenolic compounds, which are subsequently glycosylated, leading to potential negative sensory impacts in the resulting wines.2 During the 2024 harvests, Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon, Barbera, and Zinfandel grapes were intentionally exposed to various levels of smoke to establish threshold levels of free and bound volatile phenols in grapes that lead to noticeable changes in the sensory characteristics of their vinified wines. The wines were made using commercial practices at the UCD winery and stored until a complete sensory descriptive analysis (DA)3 and chemical analysis. All wines are analyzed for volatile phenols and their glycoconjugates concurrently using GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS, respectively.4,5 Previously, in 2023, a DA panel evaluated Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. Judges rated highly smoked exposed grape (HE) samples higher for “astringency” and “vicious” mouthfeel as well as “smoky,” “cooked meat,” and “rubber” aroma, which correlated with significantly elevated levels of all volatile phenols analyzed compared to other treatments. However, HE grape samples were rated lower for “fresh and fruity” aromas than all other treatments, indicating that smoke suppresses fruit aromas in grape samples. The low (LE) and medium (ME) exposed grapes were not able to be sensorial differentiated from the control grape samples, even though ME grape and wine samples were significantly higher in all volatile phenols. For the wines, the trained DA sensory panel evaluated aroma orthonsal and the five “smoke taint” retronasal, in addition to tastes and mouthfeels. ME wines showed higher levels of “smoky,” “meaty,” “cigar box,” “wood,” and “old ashtray” aromas than LE and CE wines, with HE wines most affected. Preliminary results indicate high smoke exposure causes distinct sensory differences in grapes and wines. Similarly to 2023 wines, the presented project investigates three 2024 vintage red varietal wines. It shows the possible sensory profiles in response to different smoke levels in an experimental system that exposes grapes to various smoke levels. The aim is to develop threshold levels in common wine varietals of free and bound volatile phenols that can lead to unfavorable sensory attributes in the final wines.

References

[1] Kennison, K.R.; Wilkinson, K. L.; Williams, H. G.; Smith, J. H.; Gibberd, M. R. Smoke-Derived Taint in Wine: Effect of Postharvest Smoke Exposure of Grapes on the Chemical Composition and Sensory Characteristics of Wine. J Agric Food Chem 2007, 55 (26), 10897–10901. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf072509k.

[2] Parker, M.; Osidacz, P.; Baldock, G. A.; Hayasaka, Y.; Black, C. A.; Pardon, K. H.; Jeffery, D. W.; Geue, J. P.; Herderich, M. J.; Francis, I. L. Contribution of Several Volatile Phenols and Their Glycoconjugates to Smoke-Related Sensory Properties of Red Wine. J Agric Food Chem 2012, 60 (10), 2629–2637. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf2040548.

[3] Lawless, H.; Heymann, H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices; Springer New York: New York, NY, 1998;

[4] Noestheden, M.; Thiessen, K.; Dennis, E. G.; Tiet, B.; Zandberg, W. F. Quantitating Organoleptic Volatile Phenols in Smoke-Exposed Vitis Vinifera Berries. J Agric Food Chem 2017, 65 (38), 8418–8425. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03225.

[5] Caffrey, A.; Lerno, L.; Rumbaugh, A.; Girardello, R.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Oberholster, A.; Ebeler, S. E. Changes in Smoke-Taint Volatile-Phenol Glycosides in Wildfire Smoke-Exposed Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes throughout Winemaking. Am J Enol Vitic 2019, 70 (4), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2019.19001.

Publication date: June 5, 2025

Type: Oral communication

Authors

Annegret Cantu1,*, Francesco Maioli1, Bainian Chen1, Chen Liang1, Ron Runnebaum1, Hildegarde Heymann1, Arran Rumbaugh2

1 Department of Viticulture & Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
2 United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Contact the author*

Keywords

red wine, smoke exposure, volatile phenol threshold levels, descriptive analysis

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Investigating perceptual interactions of fruity aromas in Bordeaux red wines through addition and reconstitution sensory studies

Fruity aromas, characterized by red and black fruit descriptors, are central to the identity of Bordeaux red wines [1,2]. Despite extensive research focused on identifying and quantifying volatile compounds that contribute to fruity aromas in wine, the mechanisms underlying their interactions and sensory perception remain poorly understood [3].

Oenological performances of new white grape varieties

The wine industry works to minimize pesticides and adapt to climate change. Breeding programs have developed disease-resistant grape varieties, particularly against downy and powdery mildew, to minimize pesticide applications [1]. However, their enological potential remains underexplored.

Free and bound terpene profile of recovered minority white grape varieties by GC × GC-TOFMS

Climate change presents a significant challenge for actual viticulture. In this context, recovering minority grape varieties can be a crucial strategy to ensure resilience, particularly those capable of maintaining quality and aromatic complexity under water stress.

Towards 2D mapping of gaseous ethanol in the headspace of wine glasses by infrared laser spectrometry

Under standard wine tasting conditions, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) responsible for the wine’s bouquet progressively invade the chemical space perceived by the consumer in the glass headspace.

The capacity of spectrofluorometric fingerprints to discern changes of wine composition: applications in classifying wine additives and tracking red wine maturation and ageing

Fluorescence spectroscopy combined with chemometrics has shown advantages in wine analysis due to being rapid, sensitive, and selective to fluorescent molecules. Especially due to the abundant phenolic compounds [1], the molecular fingerprints afforded by fluorescence spectroscopy can potentially be used to discern and track the change of wine composition, with two innovative investigations having been implemented.