terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Wine, environment, health and sustainability 9 Investigating biotic and abiotic stress responses in grafted grapevine cultivars: A comparative study of Cabernet-Sauvignon and Cabernet Volos on M4 rootstock

Investigating biotic and abiotic stress responses in grafted grapevine cultivars: A comparative study of Cabernet-Sauvignon and Cabernet Volos on M4 rootstock

Abstract

When grapevine plants are transplanted into already established vineyards, they face multiple challenges, including adverse climate, heavy metal accumulation from agronomic practices [1], and pressure from highly adapted pathogens [2]. For this reason, understanding the interactions between soil biota, scion, and rootstock [3] under environmental stressors is essential for improving grapevine resilience. This study investigates the combined effects of water stress, copper-induced toxicity, and Plasmopara viticola infection on the performance of grafted grapevines. Rootstock M4 was grafted with Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Volos and subjected to copper application at the soil level, drought stress followed by heavy rainfall, and pathogen inoculation. Physiological and biochemical data were collected using both traditional methods and smart phenotyping to assess plant responses [4]. Results showed that while both cultivars experienced similar levels of water stress, they successfully restored water balance post-recovery, indicating preserved root functionality. However, photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate declined under drought conditions, with a slower recovery in inoculated plants, suggesting potential impairment of above-ground structures. The severity of Plasmopara infection was largely cultivar-dependent, with a noticeable increase in downy mildew incidence in the resistant Cabernet Volos, particularly under combined stress conditions. In both cultivars, all stressors led to a minor accumulation of molybdenum in both roots and leaves, while the two cultivars exhibited different behaviours regarding iron content at the root level. These findings highlight the complex interplay between abiotic and biotic stressors and provide insights into the adaptive responses of grapevines, which can inform future vineyard management strategies to enhance plant resilience. The next phase of this research will involve conducting open-field trials to evaluate how the observed stress responses influence grape and wine quality. This approach will support the development of viticultural practices aimed at enhancing plant resilience while preserving key fruit and wine traits.

References

[1] La Torre, A., Righi, L., Iovino, V., & Battaglia, V. (2019). Evaluation of copper alternative products to control grape downy mildew in organic farming. Journal of Plant Pathology, 101, 1005-1012.

[2] Koledenkova, K., Esmaeel, Q., Jacquard, C., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Ait Barka, E. (2022). Plasmopara viticola the causal agent of downy mildew of grapevine: from its taxonomy to disease management. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 889472.

[3] Harris, Z. N., Pratt, J. E., Kovacs, L. G., Klein, L. L., Kwasniewski, M. T., Londo, J. P., … & Miller, A. J. (2023). Grapevine scion gene expression is driven by rootstock and environment interaction. BMC plant biology, 23(1), 211.

[4] Pii, Y., Orzes, G., Mazzetto, F., Sambo, P., & Cesco, S. (2024). Advances in viticulture via smart phenotyping: current progress and future directions in tackling soil copper accumulation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1459670.

Publication date: June 4, 2025

Type: Flash talk

Authors

Roberto Fattorini1,*, Talita De Oliveira Caretta1, Fadwa Benyahia1, Monica Yorlady Alzate Zuluaga1, Sonia Monterisi1, Carlo Andreotti1, Oscar Giovannini2, Ilaria Pertot2,3, Stefano Cesco1, Pii Youry1

1 Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
2 Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, 38098 San Michele all’Adige, Italy
3 Centre Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, 38098 San Michele all’Adige, Trento, Italy

Contact the author*

Keywords

grapevine stress responses, water deficit and recovery, copper toxicity, downy mildew susceptibility

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Comparison of the aroma profile in total and partial dealcoholisation of white and red wines by reverse osmosis

The increasing demand for low-alcohol and non-alcoholic wines has led to the development of advanced dealcoholisation techniques aimed at preserving wine quality while reducing ethanol content. Reverse osmosis is one of the most widely used membrane-based processes for the selective removal of ethanol [1].

The Albariño route in Uruguay: A clonal selection process to produce quality wines

In recent years, Uruguay has embraced the Albariño grape variety (Vitis vinifera L.) as one of the most promising for commercial growth. Originally cultivated in Galicia and northern Portugal, Albariño has risen to prominence in the global wine market, driving strong demand and significantly increasing grape prices [1].

Identification of compounds produced by reactions of flavonoids and acetaldehyde in wine

During aging, wine consumes small amounts of oxygen. This oxygen intake triggers a series of reactions that lead to flavonoid elongation, which is known to reduce bitterness and astringency while enhancing color stability.

Sensory patterns observed towards the oxidation of white, rosé and sparkling wines: An exploratory study

Oxygen management is crucial in terms of wine quality. Even more for white and rosé wines, which are less protected against oxidation than reds due to the lower levels of antioxidant polyphenols. This need is due to the existence of equilibria between chemical forms depending on the redox potential.

Exploring the physico-chemical modification of grape seed extracts to improve their clarifying effect in red wine

During winemaking, some byproducts are obtained, such as grape pomace, which represent 13% of winery byproducts.